et ici
REFLECTION on Presence & Portraiture
My friend, Debbie asked about my process with portraits after following the images in the LTS blog. This has helped me start to conceptualize the idea that I am drawn to people who communicate what I am calling Presence and so I engage them and then go on to take the photo when I see them ‘present’.
On reflection I think that when I am engaged with their presence they recognize that (actually I get really excited and delighted so its not hard to miss) so they rarely resist. It seems to me that people are more likely to feel uncomfortable when there is a more purely voyeuristic process and I am seeing them as ‘curiosities’ rather than a more honoring engagement.
.....
The more portraits I make the more it is obvious that there are, after all, 6 billion people so collecting ‘heads’ (like stamps) that don’t at least show the person rather than just their curiosity value is essentially boring. I also have learnt to relax more so that if people would prefer I didn’t take a picture I (almost) don’t mind at all.
I guess my work as a therapist has trained me to notice when certain aspects of the person are present however fleetingly, though I think most people have this capacity but may not identify it. Debbie asked about a ‘sort of stripped down intimacy’ and I think it is an intimate process. Maybe psychotherapy and some aspects of photography can share this engagement in what is real and present.
Hello Dom,
RépondreSupprimerI understand totally what you are saying... there is an ocean of difference between those 2 ends of the spectrum.
I find any encounter that lacks that ingredient of respect is less than it could be...and only more so when there is a camera involved!
Interesting to visit and read these thoughts!
best,
Sophie
j'apprécie particulièrement votre point de vue, Sophie, et je vous en remercie
RépondreSupprimer